TL;DR
Get baking supplies delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
VinePair published a visual timeline of 13 trends that shaped cocktail culture over roughly the first 25 years of the 21st century. It traces the craft revival from Milk & Honey’s 1999 opening through classic-drink revivals, fat-washing and bar technology, while stressing that trend dates are approximate.
VinePair has published a visual timeline of 13 cocktail trends that shaped drinking culture during the first quarter of the 21st century, tracing the arc from revived historic recipes to fat-washing and high-tech bar tools. The retrospective identifies New York’s Milk & Honey, which opened on Dec. 31, 1999, as a key starting point for the modern craft cocktail revival, but says the dates assigned to trends are rough rather than definitive.
The timeline begins with the old-school drink revival, which VinePair dates from 2000 to 2015. Bartenders revisited old recipe books and restored drinks such as the Sazerac, Negroni, Bee’s Knees and Last Word to broader prominence. The report says this interest helped establish classics that remained part of cocktail menus even after the revival’s most visible style cues faded.
VinePair places the spread of fat-washing between 2007 and 2019. It credits bartender Don Lee at New York’s PDT with bringing attention to the technique through the Benton’s Old Fashioned, made with bourbon infused with bacon fat and combined with maple syrup. The report says other bartenders later tried fats such as duck fat and butter; the method subsequently became more commonplace rather than disappearing.
Other entries chart the rise of bar gadgets from about 2015 onward, including smoking guns, iSi siphons and the flavor blaster. VinePair also identifies a shorter 2017–2019 fashion for attaching tiny clothespins to glasses to hold garnishes. The supplied report excerpt ends during its account of that trend, so it does not provide the full list of 13 entries or the timeline’s complete later developments.
How Bar Techniques Became Mainstream
The timeline offers a snapshot of how cocktail culture broadened from historical research into a mix of recipe revival, technical experimentation and presentation. For drinkers, that shift helps explain why menus may pair familiar classics with techniques such as clarified or fat-infused spirits, as well as more theatrical garnishes and tools.
It also frames these changes as more than fleeting visual fashions. VinePair says some methods that first appeared in elite cocktail programs later became common bar equipment or routine techniques. At the same time, the retrospective recognizes that trends can overlap and change at different speeds, making the sequence a guide to the period rather than a definitive history.
Products Worth Considering

KitchenAid Artisan Mini Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, 3.5 Qt, Contour Silver

KitchenAid Classic Series 4.5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Onyx Black

KitchenAid Artisan 5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Almond Cream
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Milk & Honey to Bar Labs
VinePair calls Milk & Honey’s opening on Dec. 31, 1999 a seminal moment in the modern craft cocktail revival. The article also names earlier influences, including Dale DeGroff’s work at the Rainbow Room, the opening of the original Angel’s Share in 1993 and the growth of London’s cocktail-bar scene in the 1990s. It presents Milk & Honey as a touchstone, not the sole origin of the movement.
In the years that followed, bartenders first drew attention to forgotten drinks and historic recipes, then explored ingredients and tools that changed flavor, texture and presentation. The timeline’s date ranges overlap: fat-washing is listed as taking hold from 2007, while gadgetry is placed from 2015 onward. That overlap reflects a scene where techniques did not begin or end on a single date.
““It can be difficult to pin down the exact moment these trends took off or faded away.””
— VinePair
Where the Timeline Has Limits
The timeline is explicitly a rough chronology. VinePair does not identify exact start and end dates for every trend, and the available source material does not include the complete 13-item list. Its excerpt stops during the clothespin entry, leaving the full account of that trend and the remaining entries unavailable here.
The report also does not present audience data or measurements showing how widely each trend spread. Its descriptions of a trend becoming common or losing popularity are the publication’s historical assessment, not quantified industry findings. The relative influence of individual bars, bartenders and techniques is not measured in the material provided.
The Timeline’s Next Chapter
VinePair’s retrospective points toward the next phase of cocktail culture but does not announce a follow-up project or predict which specific technique will gain ground. Its forward-looking question is how experimentation will develop as the 21st century moves toward its midpoint.
For now, readers should treat the graphic as a period overview rather than a final ranking. Further detail about all 13 trends, their timing and the evidence behind their reach would require the complete infographic and accompanying article.
Key Questions
What development does the article cover?
VinePair published a visual retrospective mapping 13 cocktail trends across roughly the first 25 years of the 21st century.
What does VinePair identify as a key starting point?
The report calls Milk & Honey’s opening in New York on Dec. 31, 1999 a seminal moment in the craft cocktail revival, while also recognizing earlier influences.
Which trends are detailed in the available report?
The supplied material discusses the revival of classic drinks, fat-washing, bar gadgets and garnish clothespins. It says the full timeline contains 13 trends, but the excerpt provided does not list them all.
Are the dates exact?
No. VinePair describes the chronology as rough and says it can be difficult to pinpoint when trends took off or faded. The date ranges should be read as approximate.
Source: vinepair.com
